Pull request replay

fix: use correct pynvml function name nvmlDeviceGetNumaNodeId

cfregly/ai-performance-engineering #9

Live PR replay

Requested change

No attributed Codex session

Trustlow

Attributionweak

Contribution0%

OutcomeMerged

Open PR on GitHub Open PR on GitHub Open PR files

0 live correlated and 0 reconstructed checkpoints remain.

What you can trust quickly

0/1 replay hunk matched directly to captured session patches.
0/1 replay hunk link to a likely authoring step in the timeline.
No commit linkage was captured for this PR yet.

Review

Intentcaptured

No attributed Codex session

Authoring proofmissing

No direct authoring proof yet.

Validationchecks only

Rely on PR checks.

Exact hunks0/1

0/1 linked back to authoring proof.

Review focus

No local validation command was captured in this replay.
1/1 diff hunk are not directly matched to a captured session patch.
1/1 diff hunk still need a clearer authoring step linkage.
No commit linkage was captured for this PR yet.

Changed code

Start at the authored lines.

Exact hunks first. Proof only where it helps verify the diff.

Files1file with exact diff proof

Exact hunks0/1direct patch matches

Linked back0/1connected to authoring proof

code/ch03/bind_numa_affinity.py0/1 exact hunk

code/ch03/bind_numa_affinity.py

Captured from 0 sessions

@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ def _gpu_node_from_nvml(device_index: int) -> int | None:

weakfile overlap

 
         # Prefer explicit NUMA node if driver exposes it
         try:
-            numa_id = nvml.nvmlDeviceGetNUMANodeId(handle)
+            numa_id = nvml.nvmlDeviceGetNumaNodeId(handle)
             if isinstance(numa_id, int) and numa_id >= 0:

Likely tied to a captured session that touched this file.

Open code/ch03/bind_numa_affinity.py at line 198

Deep review

Open only the next proof you need.

The top half should settle most review decisions. These sections answer the next question without dumping the whole session on you.

How the run unfolded (0 steps)

How the run unfolded

Prompts, proof-backed steps, and git milestones in order.

Why this replay is grounded (0 prompts · 0 reasoning · 0 transcript messages)

Why this replay is grounded

Start with the smallest captured artifacts that explain the diff. Open the transcript only if the proof path still leaves a review question unanswered.

Task prompts0

Reasoning0

Transcript0

GitHub trail (Merged)

What GitHub says

Checks, review comments, and commit attribution that support the replay.

Open PR Open PR files

Checks0no captured checks

Comments0no review comments yet

Commit links0waiting for commit linkage

No GitHub review activity has been captured yet for this replay.

What we captured

Captured evidence

0 task prompt(s)
0 reasoning summary item(s)
0 tool call(s)
0 tool output event(s)
No raw transcript stored

Provenance audit

Request grounded in 1 captured source type(s)
0 direct proof cluster(s)
0 mixed proof cluster(s)
0 inferred proof cluster(s)